(This blog was originally posted on December 26, 2014)
“I get an aura, a
warning before my epileptic seizure, so that protects me and I can pull my car
over and avoid an accident.” That’s what some people with epilepsy believe. Can
these patients truly protect themselves and the driving public? There’s not enough
information to make an accurate decision.
An article in the
December 4, 2014 issue of Neurology Today
reviewed studies reported at the 2014 American Epilepsy Society Annual Meeting.
The article concluded that neurologists and law-makers need to rethink current
recommendations about driving with epilepsy. The American Academy of Neurology previously
considered auras―“warnings”—that were consistent and prolonged to be a
favorable feature in sanctioning a driving license. Recent studies question
this belief: the aura did NOT
protect the driver from an accident. Accident rates in people who have auras
were similar to patients who did not have auras.
In their study, patients
underwent continuous video-EEG monitoring at the Yale Epilepsy Center while
simulating “driving” on portable computer-based driving simulators, complete
with brakes, gas, and a steering wheel. Researchers found that patients with
longer seizures and seizures that led to a loss of consciousness were more
likely to “crash” their vehicles in the simulated test compared to patients
with other types of seizures without loss of consciousness (e.g., simple
partial seizures). The research showed clearly that people who lose
consciousness or have serious impairments in their movements during a seizure
should not drive until treatment controls their seizures. Other patients whose
EEG showed epileptiform discharges (these correlate with altered brain
neuron-cell function) that did not alter consciousness or have other symptoms
(subclinical EEG discharges) had vague, imprecise effects on driving. However,
and very significantly, many patients who had lost consciousness did not know
that their awareness was impaired during the “subclinical” EEG discharges when
queried by the researchers.
Some states leave the
important decision of when to allow driving in people with epilepsy up to the
neurologist. But in six states, California, Oregon, Nevada, Pennsylvania, New
Jersey and Delaware, the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles makes the
ultimate decision utilizing the physician’s—not necessarily a neurologist―input.
With imprecise ability
to determine if consciousness is preserved or not, neurologists need to be
cautious in deciding whether a person who has epilepsy can drive safely. As noted
above, there is still not enough information to make a highly accurate, sound
decision about this important safety issue.
Lance Fogan, M.D. is Clinical Professor of Neurology at the David
Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. DINGS is his first novel. It is a
mother’s dramatic story that teaches
epilepsy.
No comments:
Post a Comment